Anti-Monitor

<p>Every once in a while, if we happen to be low on active staff, this type of thread is usually held. We (or I) are in search for more additions to your Staff, mainly our moderators section to help clear out violations to our Rules & Guidelines among other things such as Quality Control.  </p><p>And for that, we seek to the users to suggest other users </p><p>Here's what we're looking for: </p><p>Administrator - 1: Has powers of both Discussions and Content Moderators while also having the power to block users. (You MUST be an already existing moderator to be nominated) </p><p>Discussions Moderator - Up to 2: Has the powers to edit and delete comments and forums, while also being able to highlight threads. </p><p>Content Moderator - Up to 3: Has the powers to edit locked pages and delete and restore any page. </p><p>We have some rules when it comes to suggesting users: </p><p>2. You need a viable reason for electing someone or yourself. You cannot create a meaningless or useless reason for letting someone be nominated. </p><p>Acceptable Nomination: "I nominate [user]/myself for Discussions Moderator because he/she/me reported on the Rule Violation Report for comments several times!" </p><p>Unacceptable Nomination: "I nominate [user]/myself for Content Moderator because he/she/me is nice!" (This isn't acceptable on the basis that being a nice person doesn't make you a fit person for a serious job.) </p><p>3. A person needs <i>three</i> nominations from separate users to be considered an official nominee. </p><p>4. A person can rely on another user's already existing reasons to elect a person as long as those reasons agree with Rule 2. </p><p>This time around, I won't hold any limits to how many people you can elect at a time since our staff and user count in general is a lot shorter than recent years. And with that, you can begin suggesting users. Part II will be the voting of these nominated individuals two weeks from now, or on December 17th, 2017. </p>