Thread:Hoot Freeman/@comment-7424710-20170101042128

wew lad, this wasn't how i expected to end my year

Sans VS Bill got deleted. Not the entire page, since it had other folks versions, but just your specific version. "But why?" I can already hear you screaming, and well that's easy to explain:

'''1. You had used non-canonically and/or false information in Sans' analysis. Don't believe me? Let me pinpoint everything.'''

"Sans and his younger brother, Papyrus, are skeleton monsters with a mother as a solider who’d died in the war of humans against monsters and the father who was a highly intelligent scientist that they knew died in a serious incident leaving them to be orphans."

Sans and Papyrus had no confirmed parents, hell, Gaster himself is just a dude who has only been told of in word, that sprite people use is only a rumor, not true.

"and Papyrus in the royal guard."

Nope, not even after the events of Undertale.

"It’s a long story, the father, known as W.D. Gaster, was working on a solution to bring down the barrier that was imprisoned all the monsters in the underground and had his Tactical and Scientific Genius Sans as his assistent. Then one day he had completed and profited a machine that is literally 100% grantee for monster freedom."

Again, most of this lore is made-up and false, especially the part of Gaster making a machine and him being Sans' father.

"But knowing how the universe plays its damn trick, during the day they were going to use it for freedom, the machine somehow “mysteriously” malfunctioned and then made him into a monstrosity that made him more powerful but at the cost spirit or something. Somehow Sans has gotten a pieces of that cosmic power which had been added to his other cosmic power he has."

I don't know who gave you this lore, but it's all your headcannon and has never been close to happening in the lore. What you have said was all fiction and pales in comparison to what actually happens in Undertale. You may be correct about his awareness beyond a fourth wall, but that doesn't mean this was a cause of it.

"Like his telekinetic skills which allows him to make multiple things without even trying."

A., Sans doesn't have telekinesis, what you're referring to is his SOUL Manipulation, and B., that's not even how telekinesis works.

"There is also the Gaster blaster, hovering dragon skull the fires vaporizing energy and named after his father/master. This blaster can be multiplied size change from the size of a pea to universal size."

It may be named after Gaster, but again, not his dad. Also, nowhere has it been stated that its size can be varied from a pea to a universe. In the fight with Sans, the only diferences in the blasters is that some were big, and some were a little bigger.

"Sans is capable of pulling off fights against any highly leveled godly beings, including Photoshop Omega Flowey who is literally a Realty warping changer and file deleting monstrosity and Asriel Dreemurr, the god of Hyper Death who’s is almost like next Infinity."

At this point, I'm doubting you've ever played Undertale. Never has this happened, and I doubt it would ever happen in the first place. It is implied that Flowey has fought Sans before, but not in the Omega Flowey form.

"And for a skeleton this lazy, he’s surprisingly great going fist to fist at points."

Are you fucking serious dude?

"He single handily capable of defeat his master/father, who is twice as danger as he is."

Like, c'mon, where did you get this from?

"Okay, I think its safe to say that Sans has feats that keep going to who knows how far it has and if we’ll get to know do to short-term memory loss"

WHAT

"There is one rule to know. Don’t fuck with Megalovania skeleton. Thou why do I feel like that we forgot something about him?"

Because you didn't even try learning everything and filled most of his analysis with false and fanfiction-filled "feats" and "information".

While nothing fictional or false was added into Bill's analysis, there was a whole lot of lacking inside of the analysis itself, especially compared to Sans' mess. That's also a segway into the next point that I'm giving you.

B. The results itself.

I'm not going to disagree with you for whatever opinion I may or may not have with Sans winning. What was off about Sans winning was the fact was the illegitimate information you have given Sans were the prominent factors in why you had made him win. Not only does it make your situation even worse, it derails your entire argument because all of the feats you presented were from falsified information.

I understand writing the fight was special to you, but it doesn't excuse you from committing this violation, which in this case is labeled as Improper Debating. Hopefully, you'll learn from this.

Happy New Years. 