Talk:Sans vs Wario/@comment-25980853-20170211200204/@comment-35378993-20180815163010

I see that this could go either way. Wario is fast enough to land a hit on Sans in his Wario-Man form, and has enough stamina to wear Sans down, but Sans's attacks pierce defence and directly attack the soul. While this alone is not enough to kill Wario (Mario and Luigi, who are less resiliant, have survived being petrified through magic), karmic retribution could fell the Itallian(?) and his bad breath. Wario's best chance is to use AOE and blitzing attacks like his farts and shoulder charge respectively. Karmic retribution will SIGNIFICANTLY hurt Wario. While he has not commited genoicde, he has killed many people, stolen treasure, enslaved masses through hypnotism, and backstabbed his only friends. KARMA will hurt Wario a ton. Sans is supposed to be underestimated, but wario is less respected. He has the strenght to create small earthquakes and the ability to use power ups, though they are not in his arsenal. I say 50/50 on the victor depending on the arena. In a neutral open arena Sans wins though distancing himself from Wario's melee and aoe attacks and countering with telekeneisis, bones, and gaster blasters, but in a closed neutral area, wario wins through restricting San's movement options, literally bringing down the house to wear Sans down. Either would win with homefront advantage, but Sans could better utalize it. While wario mainly relies on strenght, he is not an entirely dumb brute, he will attack with whatever he either has on him or can find in the surroundings. Sans mainly rely's on range, blitzing, and dodging. Sans is weaker, but his haxes counter wario in many situations. (NEVER COUNT MARIO PARTY AS CANON!)