Thread:Pikazilla/@comment-26221704-20170714220815/@comment-29403514-20170715021734

"I know my place on this wiki, I'm not going to force the Admins to do my demands."

Then don't demand me to reopen a thread if you know you can't do that. I closed the thread because it was pointless and it's clearly within the rules that characters like Missingno. are blacklisted. There's a reason characters like Error Sans or W.D. Gaster don't have pages.

"Opinion."

It's not an opinion primarily because it's a fact that the reasoning was legit and valid because it literally plays off what the rules say. Me saying you handled it poorly is opinionated yes, but your examples and responses were utter horse shit imo.

"We could, as a spinoff page or section; Oak (Glitch)"

You aren't getting the point which is that glitched characters aren't allowed. Adding glitched characters not only devalues the canonical material, but it is loose material in general with too much open-ended interpretation and no canon to that certain thing in general because glitches aren't meant to exist as they are flaws in a game's programming.

"That's literally crime, I'm not doing crime. That's absurd."

I'm not saying you are doing crime. I said that you can't just say you can do whatever just because a fan wants it. This isn't discriminatory in any sense whatsoever because the fans have literally asked for certain individuals like Purple and I to help manage this wiki which is the same fans you are talking about. I had several personal requests to take down that thread by users (I will not disclose names) and majority rules.

"Rules change, and I am suggesting some rules to change, but I agree: I will follow the rules and I have no intention to break any. I am making suggestions, I am not trying to overthrow the admins or something."

The rules don't need any current revisions just because of one user's needs. It was clearly expressed by all individuals present on that public thread that they had strong discontent with the recreation of a Missingno. page with Staff also questioning it as well and disapproving of it.

"How are you comparing these pokemon then? Simply put; they are at similar levels; which is a type of stat."

Not at all. I compared them because they are a selected group of elite trainers that are near the same level of power hence they are all bunched up in one group and called "the ultimate challenge" unlike gym leaders which are purposefully separated and heavily implied to have massive power differences with the variation of them. The elite 4 however are implied to all be around the same level of power hence the scaling portion.