Thread:Credible Username/@comment-5035900-20151226053750/@comment-27464497-20151226163922

' We are all free to disagree with battles here and why we don't see eye to eye with the author, but calling authors and users bias, ignorant, and other such terms is unacceptable. '

Even if it's true? When someone makes a fight and is actually ignorant about many things (even claiming that certian events in Ben's source material didn't happen) and will then lie to his readers by claiming that a particular version of a character wasn't used in an attempt to silence criticism. But it turns out that that version was used. They were just so ignorant on Ben's abilities that they didn't even know how much information they left out...

Ignorant=/=stupid.

I called him biased because one character was given clear preference over the other. Danny was given nearly ALL of his abilties with no restrictions (even overestimated in some instances), and Ben could only use a fraction of all his powers and just ignored many Omnitrix features. Things like the Fail-safe in Omniverse, Possession Protection in human and alien forms (this one is funny because the defence actually claimed that Ben is highly suseptible to possession), and quick change feature was completely ignored.

Danny was given fan-calcs (innacurate ones at that) and had some of his abilities overestimated. Claiming that the Ghostly Wail one-shot Dan Phantom, when in reality Dan took 2 Ghostly Wails to the face and was injured, but could still fight.  Many of Ben's alien transformations were given weaknesses they '''don't actually have! '''That is why I called them biased. Which is funny because rule 6 of this site states:

''' 6. Research is REQUIRED if an outcome is to be posted. Don't even try to play favorites or have the outcome set around votes '''

When that's pretty much what happened here. Someone played favorites, and it lead to poor research and an incorrect conclusion.

You think I made that long comment just to insult people? I took me all month to pull up the sources, change some wording, and edit down (yes, what you read was the shortened version) my responce. I made it because I care about the characters represented, not because I'm a "hater" or something else. Your comment implies that I'm here just to insult people, when I'm actually correcting many mistakes they made.

Or do you really think that the comment I made wasn't constructive? Not to brag, but the comment I posted was probably one of, if not the most thought out responce that fight has ever gotten. So it being deleted for not being constructive makes no sense.

Oh, and there is no rule about comment length. Provided the comment was relevant to the conversation, it should stay. So deleting a comment because it was "too long" shouldn't happen, becaue there is no such rule prohibiting it.