Thread:Ronnie345216/@comment-29403514-20171125012605

'''It seems like you didn't learn from your first warning, but let me make this clear to you because you've been making the same comments even after one of our admins has warned you before. '''Alright, let's address the rule you have broken which is coincidentally the one you've done before.

Rule 4 Okay, so you obviously have seen this rule before explained to you, but I think I need to make sure you get the memo so that you can stop doing this as this is my job. Anyways, comments like, "Akuma wins", "Sponge bob solos", "Dialga would win", and "Dr Mario wins because he's technically Mario in a doctors outfit" (all of which are straight quotes from your comments as shown here) are not allowed.
 * One word comments (ex. bull****, wrong)
 * Comments that contribute to nothing and are often comprised of three words (ex."I disagree" or "X stomps")
 * "Solos" and "quality" comments in general, regardless if they're true or if they're a joke they're obnoxious, unnecessary and borderline disrespectful (ex. "Goku solos all of the HST" or "Waluigi solos RWBY via quality")

"X wins" comments are not allowed due to them contributing nothing because anyone can make them with no reason like, "Beerus wins against Galactus because I said so". You can just as easily voice your opinion with extended reasoning like, "Beerus wins against Galactus as he has abilities like the Hakai which can erase beings from existence and has far superior speed." "X Solos" comments are of the exact same nature, but they are generally more obnoxious as you're saying that "x character" beats all in the verse. Same point can be established with actual reasoning. Also, saying that Dr. Mario wins a battle just because it's actually Mario doesn't qualify as proper reasoning either. That's practically the same thing as an "x wins" comment but in a different word construction. Please give added reasoning for comments like these.

See, the thing is, this wouldn't be such a huge problem if you didn't already show that you were capable of giving such responses requested as you've made comments like, "rooting and betting spy being more expirneced and skilled and having more weapons plus robbie isnt much of a fighter so i doubt he stands a chance plus the spy can cloke himself to trick robbie,backstab robbie and he can sap robbies invetions with the sapper." While the grammar in your comments might not be the sharpest, this is still miles better than the more frequent responses you've been showing.

I suggest you peruse, or quickly read through the Rules &amp; Guidelines before making more comments on random pages. '''I cannot stress this enough that this is your last warning and there will be not "buts" afterwards. An admin has already had to tell you before to please not do this, but you've disregarded that with our guidelines and kept making comments of that nature despite being told not to. While you aren't doing the worst thing possible, this shouldn't be a realistic issue whatsoever. If you have the time to comment on pages, it won't hurt you to add some reasoning to your comments.''' If you continue to be ignorant to the rules and violate them, there will be consequences because this would be the second time you have a warning when it should probably be something greater. I hope you take this seriously because getting in trouble over minute comments is something you really shouldn't be doing in the first place, especially after that first warning. 