Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-27150398-20180211135035/@comment-26153757-20181123014825

" This thread is for criticism." Stop saying that. It i'snt true, not entirely that is. This thread is partly about critcism because critcism naturally does come with reviewing something. But if you're just going to make a blanket statement by saying that the thread is about criticism then you're implying that it is all about giving negative critique but the fact of the matter is, this thread is about reviewing battles which comes with positive and negative. I'm not going to say anymore that Vrok should say something positive. I'm done with that. And I also won't say anymore that any comment needs to have something positive. You're right that everyone on here is free to review in the way that they truly feel as long they are respectful, I retract my previous quip with Vrok's review.

But what I will say is that I disagree with your idea that the thread is about critcism. I think it's quite clear that that i'snt true because if that was the case then this thread would be completely filled with only critiques about people's battles from every single person on the thread. But that i'snt what this thread is now is it? It has positive and negative. So no, this thread is not simply "about criticism", it is about reviewing battles which includes criticism but is not limited to critcism but also positive input as well. I think we can both agree on that and should end the little debate here because you and I have been derailing the thread with our argument.