Talk:Link vs Dante/@comment-3463132-20151125193418/@comment-3463132-20151126024052

@Warp

But the premise remains the same, he has not demonstrated any feats for us to judge him by. It's just as viable to say he can destroy a continent as destroy a mountain as destroy a city. There's equal proof for all of them- the man has no given feats for his DC that place him on that level.

And in the case of unknowns, you take the lowest possible amount- precisely because you don't want to overstate what a character can do for these fictional battles. That's why feats have high-ends and low-ends, you're supposed to use the low-end when you aren't sure.

Case in point, in Battle of the Gods Goku and Beerus go from cloud-level to past the mesosphere in a certain number of seconds, which would give a speed feat. (It's not the best speed feat but it's conveniant)

However, clouds do not have a "uniform" height and the mesosphere doesn't really either.

So, in order to get the low-end, I would take the highest height of the clouds and the lowest height of the mesosphere.

To get the high-end I would do the reverse, the lowest height of the clouds and the highest height of the mesosphere.

However, if that was ALL I had to go on for Goku's speed, I would have to use the low-end- because I can't for certain say he made the high-end. That's why Whiz and Boomstick use the words "At least" so often in Deathbattle, they are using this same rule. You already know this.

So why am I having to consider Link multi-continent in durability when his opponent has no feats to put him at that level? Demise didn't do anything of the sort, so why should I be scaling Link accordingly?

It's wrong for Demise not having the feat.

And it's wrong for scaling Link to that just because he fought him.

That's how I see it, do your battle how you please, there's nothing I can do to stop you. All I wanted to do was mention Dante's strengths.