Talk:Goku/@comment-30400431-20160520214654/@comment-3463132-20160523023928

@Crop

Alright then- a simple example since I know you've been reading my OC story.

Let's say I give Subject 000 a feat I think is cool but don't overly look into in terms of numbers. Someone then calculates it and says Subject 000 is MCB in terms of strength. Then, when asked, I say Subject 000 is only meant to be building-level.

Which is it? MCB or building? How strong is Subject 000?

Replace me with Akira and Subject 000 with Goku. There is no difference. If it's okay for me then it's okay for Akira. And if it's not okay for me then you really have to ask yourself how fair you're being when you say I can't even make limits for my own character.

'contradiction'

There is an inherent flaw with this logic though:

If the character is nerfed via WoG then it isn't allowed because it may be less than what someone says a feat is.

If a character is buffed via WoG then it's allowed because you can't contradict it- any feats that show lesser power is simply ignored because WoG said the character was better. The contradiction is still there- it's simply ignored.

All I do is treat WoG equally whether it's a buff or nerf- in this way- I am fair and objective. I do not change how I approach the situation regardless of the feat or WoG involved. Can you truly call this wrong? And if so- explain how.