Talk:Zero VS Meta Knight/@comment-26814804-20160620172202

Ok, I'm not sure how Zero Vs Meta Knight would go. I'm fairly positive that Kirby would stomp X, but that's just because of inhale hax and the fact that X is mostly confined to ranged attacks. On the other hand, I think Zero Vs Meta Knight is much closer.

Let me try to get the lay of the land.

Strength: Not the same as AP, but in sheer physical strength, I think MK takes it. Zero has never shown any real feats of physical strength, unlike MK, who effortlessly lifted a huge boulder, IIRC.

AP: I'm thinkin' Zero here. Not only is the Z-Saber just as good as Galaxia, but Zero also boasts a huge range of abilities that makes MK's pale in comparison. He takes utility by a mile, at least.

Durability: Real close, with a slight edge to Meta Knight. Zero's tough, but, unlike MK, we've actually seen him take damage. He has healing abilities with the E-Tanks, but MK can heal himself too, so they're close there.

Speed: Definititely MK. He can reach speeds in flight that Zero could only possibly reach with teleportation, which is obviously not useful in combat.

Inteligence: Definitely Zero. He's a brilliant strategist, more than capable of leading Hunters into battle, and he is also literally a computer. MK is smart, but not that smart.

Sword Skill: This is a big one. Since much of this battle would be nothing but bladed combat, the simple question remains- who is the better swordfighter? Well, MK is obviously incredibly skilled, honing his abilities, of which there are many, over hundreds or thousands of years. Meanwhile, Zero has been shown to be superior to Sigma, Colonel, and Dynamo, at least as far as bladed combat goes, and each of them were literally built for that exact purpose. I'd say they tie there.

So, MK 3, Zero 2, tie 1. Edge to MK.