Thread:ImagoDesattrolante/@comment-7424710-20170107182216/@comment-26477305-20170107191920

So all of this is about me basically saying fights were stomps but also providing actual valid evidence for saying they were stomps yes (or something like that)? Why am I not allowed to say this? I perfectly know that nowhere on this wiki says that no fight on the wiki has to be so close but it also doesn't say you aren't allowed to say it's a stomp either. There is absolutely nothing wrong with stating something like that with actual evidence and I hope you know this - it is just debating. I never did say I would delete something for being a stomp or something, nor do I know why you're getting those reports. They are wrong.

You keep on stating things from many weeks ago; why? We have already spoken about Wolverine vs. Lucy Diclonius no? Also, that screenshot is extremely unneeded...that moment on the chat was nearly a month ago and I changed my mind, and took back what I said soon after. You know this since you were there, I directly remember that and I hope you do as well. Why are you bringing up solved matters in a cease and desist like this? Is it because without them you don't have much evidence against me? You know we've already sorted this out - or at least, I assume this. You very much implied that it was over. In combination, this makes you seem like somewhat two faced in a kind of way and it's incredibly unneeded.

More on the bit about the screenshot, like I said it was literally so long ago and I had spoken to GA and you (I believe) about it straight after - I changed my mind literally straight after this, me and Breeky seemed to make up as well. Another thing is that I never, ever said it was an unopinionated rule that stomp matches are banned, I said it was unopinionated that some matches are complete stomps. Who told you this? It's very strange how they got this much wrong, it's almost like they weren't there or that they're lying. Nonetheless, this was useless to post and I would've hoped you had taken a closer look into that incident, or remembered more even. This is also very incriminating to me.

It's improper debating by it's definition. I didn't mean that it needed definition, I literally just meant it was debating that was improper or wrong in it's form. If I considered it so bad that it needed to be deleted, I would've deleted it but I didn't and I never implied that it required deletion, either. Also, I did mention it - I literally said the reasons I thought this in the comment. By the way, you're wrong about that imaginary improper debating boundary. It by itself literally means debating that is improper, that it doesn't work. You are calling me out for stating this and I don't know why, after reading that paragraph five times. You knew I didn't mean that it required deletion right? Another thing, where does it state that you have to ignore the stats and debating in battles?

That literally makes it useless though? Why don't we all just do weird OMM/DBX like fanfictions instead where the only matter is about the writing and no one actually cares if it's accurate at all? It sounds like a paradise to a lot of people here but this never was what Death Battle existed for and the creators directly state this a good couple of times. Do we forget what the creators directly say on this wiki? It's fine if you do, but then why do we call it the Death Battle Fanon Wiki? It sounds useless to me.

No, you are saying I'm doing a bad job as a Content Moderator. I'm not making any big mistakes at all, especially ones that are severe, or dangerous. Why do you say this? I'm not doing any harm to people, I'm not deleting any fights for terrible reasons, and I am not saying that they require deleting. I am only saying they're wrong with actual reasoning and evidence and I have really done nothing other than that.

I'm sorry if I have sounded a bit rude or mean in this, I didn't mean to. But this is very incriminating and embarrassing for me, it basically plants a huge notice on my wall saying that I am a bad person who deletes fights for bad reasons, saying that I'm a person who deletes fights for being innaccurate in my view. This is not true and it troubles me quite a bit.

I hope you understand what I'm saying.