Thread:Danibom/@comment-27150398-20190407124831

Hello Danibom, you’ve probably noticed by now that you have been blocked for 6 months and I will now explain the reasons for your block to you now.

The first thing I wanted to talk to you about was your response to the previous Warning I gave you. While I don’t mind having civilised discussions with the users I give out Warnings and Cease and Desists to regarding their behaviour, you essentially said that me and the other Admins had made a mistake in giving you said Warning eventhough we had legitimate reasons for giving it to you (these reasons being the instances where your behaviour in certain concerned us). While you didn’t argue this point any further once me and Ploz had responded to your message, the fact that you said that it was a mistake that you had been given a Warning gave off the impression that you didn’t take it seriously, which wasn’t great.

Rule 6:'''Please keep all debates civil, both in chat and in comment sections. If you don't agree or find faults with a death battle here or a canon one you're allowed to say so but please do so in detail.''' As well if you enjoyed the battle then you should say as well. This is so you users will avoid using statements such as "This is so wrong, you're a dumbass" or "I disagree heavily, fight was stupid/utter trash" where they give no reason for why they disagree or dislike the fight.
 * In debates, please learn to accept other's views and take a non-hostile, civil approach to debating. For example, you might use power-scaling but some others do not or you don't agree with another user on a character's destructive capability. In both these examples, do not disrespect one another for having different views at all. Do not use profane/vulgar words meant to make your debating opponent seem like a lesser person (ex. Wanker, fanboy, dumbass, etc). Essentially please be open-minded when debating and try not to come off as a close-minded know it all.

Peach vs Palutena - “At least, he let Luigi win in his Death Battle but since when he confirmed his last Mario battle is to stop taking hate?”

I don’t know if you intended for your comment to come across this way, but the way it is worded implies that you think Peep4Life (the user you’re referring to) is a big Mario hater, when all he did was make Pit beat Mario against the popular opinion of Mario beating Pit. While I know that you personally experienced a lot of uncalled for backlash for your views on the Mario franchise back in 2016, this doesn’t give you the excuse to make other users feel bad about their views on said franchise.

Shazam vs Ms. Marvel - “And I think is because there are more males in the Wikis than girls.

LuckyEmile is not the only female user, right?”

The problem with this comment is that you’re basically implying that because most of the wiki’s users are male, they would automatically root for Shazam, which is honestly a pretty sexist comment to make. Shazam’s gender is not the only reason the community was rooting for him over Captain Marvel (these reasons being the matchup arguably being one-sided in Shazam’s favour and people not liking how Carol was portrayed in the Civil War 2 storyline).

In conclusion, one of the main issues me and the other staff members have with you is again the way you word your comments. While you may not intend to come across in a negative way in your comments, since this is the Internet (where it is a lot harder for people to interpret your behaviour since they can’t analyse the way you speak in certain situations or the body language you display in said situations), how people word their messages online can make a real difference to how other online users view them and as you have continually worded your comments in a controversial manner, this has resulted in you being warned by the Admins several times for your behaviour in the past and because your behaviour ultimately hasn’t improved, this is one of the reasons you have been given this block.

The second reason for your block is your tendency to ‘play the victim card’ whenever you received any backlash for your behaviour. While the instances I’ve listed here of you doing this took place back in 2016 and 2018, we (me and the other staff members) DO NOT wish to experience a repeat of this behaviour and have decided to take action against it to prevent it from surfacing again which has resulted in you being blocked.

To be clear Danibom, me and the other staff members are NOT trying to bully you by giving you this block. While you have contributed to the wiki a lot over the years and your behaviour has improved in some ways, the overreactive, stubborn and inconsiderate parts of your personality remain, which is why we find ourselves in the situation we are in now.

This is your last chance to try and improve your behaviour before you are given an infinite block, so I’d highly recommend that you remind yourself of the Rules and Guidelines and try and shape up, if you want to continue contributing to the wiki.

Also, in case you attempt to make a sock account, I suggest you read this Rule as not doing so will make your block worse.

26. Please DO NOT create alternate accounts/sockpuppet accounts to dodge blocks and/or chat bans. If any users are found to have created sockpuppet accounts, their sockpuppet accounts will be given infinite blocks and/or infinite chat bans along with their original account. We understand that this might sound a bit strict, but if we were more tolerant of sockpuppets, there would likely be lots of blocked/banned users trying creating them, which would cause a lot more disorder and chaos on the wiki.
 * However, if you wish to have a detailed discussion with a member of the Admin team (preferably the Admin who blocked you or the Head Bureaucrat) about why your original account was blocked you are allowed to create an alternate account to SOLELY carry out this purpose. If you are found using said alternate account to do anything else other than inquire about your block (ex. editing pages) then this will count as proper sockpuppeting and both your alternate and original accounts will be given infinite blocks. Additionally, if you begin to get aggressive or even abusive towards the Admin you’re talking with, your alternate account will be blocked and you will not be able to discuss your block with the Admin team anymore.
 * If you wish to discuss a Chat Ban with the Chat Mod, Superintendent, Discussion Mod, Operator, Overall Moderator or Admin that gave the Chat Ban and you’re not already blocked, you don’t need to create an alternate account to have this discussion with them and can just talk with them using your original account.
 * These discussions should generally only be used by users to clarify why they have been blocked and it is unlikely that they will be unblocked after the conservation has taken place (unless they were blocked because of a genuine misunderstanding) so after a member of the Admin team has clarified the exact reason why the user was blocked,they should simply wait until the block on their original account has expired (or move on if their original account has been given an infinite block) otherwise both their alternate and original accounts will be given infinite blocks.

Be careful with your behaviour.

Big out. 