Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-5035900-20170120025856/@comment-3463132-20170218175612

You definitely should not delete battles just through claims of "bias", "downplay", or "incorrect research". Barring the extreme obvious exceptions- these are all extremely opinionated- not subjective. I have just recently been dubbed a "Metal Gear fanboy" because I pointed out Snake has every advantage over Bourne, who I was also deemed to "downplay" by pointing out the same.

Obviously, I do not believe I'm wrong, but just because more people think one thing is true over another doesn't make it so, that's arguing from popularity, which is a logical fallacy.

Nobody should be banned because they think differently. I speak fom experience- how much shit did I get for making Kirito beat Link? It makes sense to me and logically all adds up from my point of view. It's just I see certain feats differently from others.

Obviously yes, some people make utterly trash fights, I recall a battle that was like 3 lines of text involving Batman. If you can establish an objective criteria for what makes a poor match, one that isn't based on anything subjective- then go for it.

Otherwise, don't go deleting fights because you don't agree with the research. Deathbattle itself has times where people don't agree with the research- that's no reason to delete a fight.