Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-5035900-20170120025856/@comment-3463132-20170120051849

Nkstjoa wrote:

Just to back up Nk on this- regardless of what any member thinks. This is a subjective area. Two people can look at the same exact feat and interpret it differently. That's because unless something is explicitly spelled out- there will always be room for interpretation.
 * 9. Research is REQUIRED if an outcome is to be posted. Don't even try to play favorites or have the outcome set around votes.

Now I admit that I have a personal interest in this area as some users frequently insist I do poor research. However, others insist the same research is good. This by itself should give an inkling that this area isn't as solid as some would think.

That's why there's no good reason to remove a battle based on "bad" research. Because "bad research" is almost always used to mean, "I disagree with this outcome".

In the end, any 'actual debate' in real-life has a moderator to determine when something is true or false and whatnot. Fictional debates like here and vsbattles, outskirts, narutoforums, comicvine, factpile, spacebattles, etc. do not have any supreme being to make such rulings. That means you will never have something ironclad and untouchable or unquestionable.