Talk:Weeping Angel vs SCP-173/@comment-35564842-20181212161308

The entire “fact” part of SCP-173 is full of falsehoods. 1. There is no true canon to the SCP universe and even so I don’t think the foundation was created specifically to contain 173. 2. Were the hell does it say that 173 was found in the 19th century. Answer: Not on its bloody page! 3. That description of a Euclid fits more into a Safe class SCP, Euclids are unpredictable and therefore more difficult to contain. 4. (Just to clarify) The part about it being unable to move even if you look at it through walls was a Joke presumably based on a glitch in SCP: Containment Breach. 5. There are several SCPs outside of even the 001 proposals that are more powerful and indestructible than 682 such as 2317. But yes it was able to damage 682 enough to make it scared of 173.

Just fun facts: There is actually one SCP where you just need to look in its general direction from a distinct distance for it to become immobile and that is 689. These two statues similarities are just coincidences. They were made only a few months apart but 173 actually came before.