Thread:Withersoul 235/@comment-27150398-20180317091523/@comment-24530269-20180323090030

I have thought of a new Rule that could potentially be added. Due to the fact that the grand majority is almost guaranteed vote "No" to it, I suggest to not make it vote-based.

The rule in question would be that it is now banned to use solely the VS Battles Tiering System when deciding matches.

http://deathbattlefanon.wikia.com/wiki/2d_Indie_Platformer_Battle_Royale#comm-397977 In this comment for example, Seb ranks the characters through only Attack Potency and Speed.

http://deathbattlefanon.wikia.com/wiki/Thanos_and_Darkseid_vs_Dimentio_and_Enerjak#KO.21 This battle has a Result section where the sole reason for the winners' victories is higher Attack Potency. (Not to mention some of the Tiers there don't exist anymore)

It is seriously becoming an issue that people are now deciding Battles through an entirely unrelated system. Not to mention Lifting Strength is now seen as unimportant due to solely VS Battles' system, while in DB, it is relevant, as it proves one is physically stronger. VS Battles ≠ Death Battle, and so are their ways of deciding outcomes. Death Battle has its own research, therefore VS Battles' system shouldn't be used for the most part.

In short, this rule would be the following: Attack Potency (and Speed) / VS Battles' Tiering System can be used as a factor in debates, battles and comments, but not as the sole reason of why a character would win.

If the rule is broken, a warning will be issued. If the reasonings aren't changed or expanded at the deadline, it will be deleted, and if they don't stop, we'll have to take further action.

How does this sound?