Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-5035900-20170120025856/@comment-26221704-20170217131043

@DarthMario, in most instances yes however to claim there is no situation in which there is poor research is asinine. For example, Medic VS Ryuko was a fight that was deleted because it heavily downplayed Ryuko's feats and overplayed Medic's feats even claimin absurdities like he can fight with devils who have no known destructive capacity against a widely accepted Large/Multi-Contintenal Ryuko.

In truth, most other cases are indeed subjective but poor research usually constitutes purposely downplaying or overplaying a character via usually exaggerated feats or ridiculous claims or even just ignoring feats that are widely accepted (ex. Certain Stands in JoJo are clearly MFTL, to claim otherwise is ignoring the idea of outlier and disregarding official statements, "UnderTale characters can't hurt characters w/o a soul and are Door/Tree level" is wrong because the characters have shown proper physical and hax feats, "Saitama can one punch anyone so he can beat Goku, Superman, etc" is a No Limits Fallacy due to having no feats that put him at that level).