Talk:Goku VS Kirby/@comment-30761642-20170314143923/@comment-31200947-20170401231902

>Because it contradicts the feat shown therefore it would be inconsistent.

Even if that was correct that happened with that of "putting the characters to their maximum potential"?

>No they aren't very funny magolor is the only one with UNIVERSAL feats.

Since Star Dream, solid power scaling and the written information that gives the game doesn't mean anything to you, what about Galacta Knight?

>While high universal is having infintie power basically able to destroy infintie amounts of universe

I just prove that Kirby is Universal+, nothing more than that.

>What if sceneries are what if and can have massive inconstancys because they are what if.

Discredit a what if scenario for being a what if scenario is tremendously redundant. This is still things that Kirby is able to do, and also most of them become or are canon( Marx Soul, Star dream being attacked by GK, etc).

>The author should know how strong there character.

Welcome to the vs debates, why do you think there are so many complicated accounts and aploximations?

>

If you don't want to believe what the authors say good for you. There is also a little difference between power levels here.

>demonbane characters

I don't know them. What I do know are characters being as powerful as the creators claim they are. A character is a concept of ideas embodied is some form of art, and if those who created that concept of ideas believe or say that can do certain things then there is no reason to not interpret that concept of ideas being capable of that. Except obvious exaggerations like Stan Lee saying that Galactus is the most powerful character of Marvel. In this instance the game menu and Star Dream talking confirm what Nintendo said.