Talk:Meta Knight vs Shulk/@comment-31200947-20180628033355/@comment-31200947-20180628231349

Many agree with Tifa scaling to Seph tho, using a Arceus is clearly a false equalization. By your logic of requiring story evidence that a character canonicly got x thing then one can downplay 95% of the power-ups characters like Mario have and say that there is no evidence of those characters using them.

Destrucive Capability and Durability are irrelevant next to hax, you know the thing that ignores durability. It will be different if he had immunity or resistance to these powers, or had a higher dimensional body to ignore 3-D hax. If the destrucive power and durability of a 3-D character were something that determines resistance to hax then you may as well say that Shulk can resist the dozens of hax that exist just because lol he's too powerful for them. Also Telepathy=/=Morality & Empathic Manipulation, especially not at MK's level.

None of that proves that he would be able to do something against someone millions upon millions of times faster. Like, how fast does a being have to be to blitze Shulk in your opinion?

>Also, Meta Knight will ALWAYS give Kirby a sword to fight him

And he doesn't always fight Kirby, your point?

>Playing as Meta Knight is games is differant as having a game without enemies to fight is just.....walking. Yeah, the programmers needed to include enemies or else people would hate playing as Meta Knight. It's again a game mechanics thing.

This is just absolutely ridiculous, are you hearing yourself?

>He wants to best his opponents when they are at their best.

Surely, but not all the time, much less this is a explorable weakness he has in combat. Having to explain this seems insulting.