Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-5035900-20170120025856/@comment-27190018-20170218171448

When I reported Chris vs the Punisher for having a plagiarized Chris bio, I was expecting the Chris bio to be deleted. Nope, entire page deleted. Yes, the fight was lacking in proper research and had a very faulty conclusion, but the reason for its deletion was officially documented as "plagiarism".

I was a little shocked, tbh. And now, I'm seeing battles get deleted left and right, all without warning. The red flag was Voldemort vs Shao Kahn; yes, the battle was heavily biased in Voldemort's favour and the result was blatantly ignorant, but the battle itself was not badly written. Voldemort's analysis showed some in-depth research onto the Harry Potter world, and the actual fight was average. Not great, but average, as in, similar to hundreds of other battles on the wiki. And the entire page got deleted without warning, after being on the wiki for maybe a year?

I'm all for cleaning up, but this is not the way to do it. You guys need to give warning, because I'm seeing this rapidly go out of control. I've written some controversial battles, and my next battle's outcome relies heavily on interpretation of a feat. I put loads of effort into my fights, but now I'm honestly worried that all it will take is someone more prominent on the wiki to shout "bias" and have it all deleted, neither offering me warning or a chance to fix what was wrong.

You guys want to improve the standards of the wiki; I get that. I support that. But this is not the way to do it.