Thread:Pikazilla/@comment-29403514-20180316213850

Alright, don't even act like you didn't have this coming. You've gotten many warnings and notices from myself, Lion, Ghost, and Wither and you've still persisted even after being asked to actually stop. '''This is your last warning and you have to shape up. You've been let off too many times for this behavior to get any more "second chances".''' I'm just going to get straight to the point so that you understand what I'm talking about. This is only addressing the comment issues only. The page issues with your edit wars with Ghost are something that can be taken care of another time (it's not in my realm of authority either since I'm a Discussions Mod).

>You: "Mario highballing is this year's meme apparently."

What makes you think this is okay? Even if you don't personally agree with people on how they view a character, you have no right to insult them based on an opinion. And if you're not directly stating it, you are mocking a user for their belief in a fictional character. Seriously? You've broken Rule 4 by doing this. It would be one thing if you were just making a stomp comment or something that is minor, but you calling someone's opinion a "meme" is incredibly offensive to the user you're directing this to. This is incredibly self-explanatory in itself. You are belittling and mocking individuals with a statement like this. Would you like it if I told you that your beliefs are garbage on Sonic just because I don't agree? No. You would probably be offended. That's what you're doing to users. You've done this repeatedly by labeling people as fanboys in the past. Heck, some of those insults were only a couple to a few months ago. Overall, you should easily understand that some of this caliber isn't allowed.
 * Provoking, belittling, and mocking an individual in the comments is entirely unacceptable. This includes any infamous user, sockpuppet, troll or otherwise. As well as insulting and targeting an individual user, their battle idea, or works (ex. ganging up on a user be it sockpuppet, troll, or infamous such as TeenGohanFighter)

>You: "I honestly don't know why there is so much Mario highballing on this wiki; it's honestly absurd."

I'm sorry but remind me again how this relates to Bowser vs The Hulk? Oh wait, it doesn't. We're going back to the problem early that this is demeaning still just like the last comment. There's another issue as well. Your comment contributs nothing to the page. It isn't even a written battle yet. You're literally either just doing it for attention or bait which has no contribution for the page. Breaking Rule 4 once again it seems? Alright, I'll just leave the rule here and continue on. >You: "Saitama punches Goku and wins in one punch because he's the ONEPUNCHMAN. That's the point."
 * Comments that contribute to nothing and are often comprised of two or three words (ex."I disagree" or "X stomps")

Ignoring the really flawed logic here, this still violates the rules regardless. Why? It lacks sufficient reasoning. Saying, "Saitama is the One Punch Man and beats Goku" isn't good reasoning. That's something he only does due to him being a parody character based off of common Shonen tropes. Maybe if you justified it like saying, "Saitama should win because Boros' Star Collapsing Roaring Cannon can destroy stars. Also, Saitama is unrivaled in his series which means he is undoubtedly stronger than Goku based on the fact before."

I don't personally agree with this reasoning, but I think you get the point that you need legitimate reasoning for your comments to stay up. Comments involving titles and such hardly pass off as reasoning and more or less just laziness from the individual who made the comment. You have to follow this rule for your comments to be able to pass through as legitimate. Breaking the exact same rule again. This last one is self-explanatory. You clearly haven't respected other people's views. You label people as Mario highballers and just automatically assume that all arguments are wrong because "VS Battles"? I think I need to highlight the part which says, "In both these examples, do not disrespect one another for having different views at all." What are you doing? Labeling people as Mario highballers for having an opinion that isn't yours. This is a common issue in all of your replies as well. This is your last chance before you will get a Cease & Desist. You have shown behavior and remarks are meant to belittle other users just to make a point. This is unnacceptable and intertolerable. You've pushed your luck too far up until now. Read the Rules &amp; Guidelines before you make any more contributions because I'm pretty sure both of us don't want to have this conversation again. If you continue to persist, punishment will be inflicted for your rule breaking. Have a good day. 
 * Comments that contribute to nothing and are often comprised of two or three words (ex."I disagree" or "X stomps")
 * In debates, please learn to accept other's views and take a non-hostile, civil approach to debating. For example, you might use power-scaling but some others do not or you don't agree with another user on a character's destructive capability. In both these examples, do not disrespect one another for having different views at all. Do not use profane/vulgar words meant to make your debating opponent seem like a lesser person (ex. Wanker, fanboy, dumbass, etc). Essentially please be open-minded when debating and try not to come off as a close-minded know it all.