Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-27126152-20161017043524/@comment-3463132-20161204055536

MP999 wrote: I like Friendly's first two points, but I'm not so sure about the third, because sometimes, I like the sudden game-changer (Misty Knight, Avatar DVD extras, etc.) If a character was simply stated to have super speed in the rundown, but a specific speed feat that allowed them to win was examined during the results, would that be acceptable? Perhaps a better way of wording it would be, the conclusion should mention the relevant feats used for the reasoning.

So don't just say they have superior speed, say they have superior speed because of something and mention why.

Toph would be a good example, they mentioned she could sense Earth, then in the conclusion brought that extra bit of info to cement the deal.