Thread:EnnardTrap1987/@comment-26198742-20181012233203

Alright, so it has recently come to the Admins and My attention that you created regarding "Cliches" that Screwattack perform in the episodes however it has quickly become an issue that could spiral out of control this blog is heavily inaccurate and rather offensive but allow me to break down each "Cliche" one by one and other Administrators and I can add onto them.


 * A Character Winning the Rematch when they've won the original

Alright, the reasoning that you list are very much flawed as you are accusing Screwattack of having the winner win over and over again when so far, we have only had ONE Rematch of an already existing one which is Goku vs. Superman and if you have properly research both of them; then you will see why Superman won each one however you also attempt to use Boba Fett vs. Samus Aran Remastered when a Remastered is not the same thing as a Remaster when the point of a Remaster is to improve the quality of the original version, while a rematch has the possibility of the outcome changing and the fact that you are accusing them of having a Character win a rematch when they've won the original is flawed as we don't even know the outcome of Sonic vs. Mario 2.


 * Anime/Manga Characters losing to American cartoon characters

Alright before I go further into this one allow me to correct two things which were your examples of Kirby vs. Majin Buu and Gundam vs. Optimus; Kirby originated in a Japanese Game that was created by Nintendo which is a Japanese Company and Optimus Prime as well as Transformers originated from Japan making it a Japanese show, so using them as examples is flawed as they do not originate from America but are only more popularly known in America.

With that out of the way, you are claiming that Screwattack have Anime/Manga Character Lose against American Cartoons when that isn't even remotely the case as we rarely have Anime/Manga Characters pitted against a American Cartoon Series with the only ones so far (As far as I am Aware) being Gaara vs. Toph and Gundam Epyon vs. Tiger Zord with them giving legitimate reasons on why Toph Won and with Gundam Epyon vs. Tiger Zord having ended with Gundam Epyon which is an Anime/Manga Character winning.


 * Mortal Kombat Kharacters winning

Mortal Kombat Characters winning aren't truthfully that much of a cliche as something I don't believe you keep in mind is that Death Battles are RESEARCHED, if the research points to a Mortal Kombat Character winning then they are going to win there fights and something that you didn't seem to acknowledge is that Mortal Kombat Character have lost such as with Akuma VS Shang Tsung and Fulgore vs. Sektor.

If the Research points to the Mortal Kombat Character win then they are going to win because that's what the RESEARCH points too.


 * Bullshit Reasoning's for a character winning a fight

I will simply repeat what I said for the last one, Death Battles are RESEARCHED. No Analysis that they do research on is going to be perfect especially when they have so much lore, abilities, feats, and faults to cover and depending on the time of the Researched battle; any info that is currently now available about said characters was NOT available when the episode air and you list several battles namely Goku vs Superman, Tracer vs Scout, Mewtwo vs Shadow, and Carnage vs Lucy.

I am going to stress this point out.... All of the Outcomes of every Single Death Battle that Screwattack has made to this very day, it is their OPINION and it is something that they are ENTITLED to have it and the same applies to every single battle on this very Wikia; Every outcome is the OPINION of a User who has done the research and is what the research that they have done points to that outcome and the same is with Screwattack; The research that their research team points to that specific outcome is their opinion.

Claiming they are wrong for having said opinion just because the outcome isn't the desired or proper one is quite frankly, redundant and rather stupid.

It also doesn't help the fact that you are accusing them of Downplaying a Character in order for the opposing to win or having their preferred character despite them saying on numerous instances that most of their preferred characters lost (the biggest example being Goku) due to the research pointing towards them losing.

Alright.. for someone who is claiming that they aren't sexist, you sure as hell picked a controversial topic to list as a "Cliche" and the fact that you even listed it is making yourself look sexists.
 * Women beating Men

Moving on, you claimed that and I quote

"ScrewAttack are probably doing this to avoid backlash and getting considered sexists. But they really need to get results right even if its sexist. Their has literally never been a battle where a man fought a woman and the man won."

Okay, I gotta ask..... '''WHY? Why would you accuse them of something like this when again if you RESEARCHED the Characters in questions on a deeper and much more intimate level then you will find that in most instances where the Female Character defeats the Male Character it is JUSTIFIED '''and has various reasoning

You also claim that Female Characters are always winning when in Roronoa Zoro vs. Erza Scarlet, Dante vs. Bayonetta, and Lucario vs. Renamon (As Lucario is usually considered Male and Renamon Female) instead of your claim that Female Characters always win.... Zoro, Dante, and Lucario win when their opponents were female so Screwattack being afraid of backlash and appearing sexists isn't the case when a majority of the outcomes are based on research.


 * Battles taking place at night/in dark areas

This one isn't even that big of a deal as various Movies, Cartoons, Anime/Manga, TV Shows, and Video Games do this and have continued to do so to this very day so this one is honestly much more petty than the rest.


 * Fights ending off with explosions

You claim that all the battles ending in explosions is getting repetitive however I don't think that you understand that if an attack results in an explosive effect then they need to have it result in that effect because the attack is supposed to have an explosive effect and a majority of the time; they have to give the death a brutal ending and a majority of the time, an explosive death is the most likely way to achieve a brutal ending.

With all of that now done, I am going to be honest with you about this Blog, Ennard. This entire Blog is controversial as you are making claims that are either heavily flawed and/or just downright incorrect, nitpicking certain things without delving into it further, bringing in a topic that is literally controversial already in this day and age (Women beating Men), and quite frankly... feels more like an attempt to start something against Screwattack even though they are just doing their job and that is being an entertainment business by making these Death Battles.

No series or show is perfect, they are going to have flaws however in most instances however the flaws are there indirectly as a result of certain things and how they operate as they don't things vastly different from debates like Myself, You, or any other user on this Wikia or Vs Battle something that they are allowed to do and something they shouldn't be hounded on or attempted to have controversy sparked over. 