Thread:Komodo25M/@comment-38397104-20190724190259/@comment-25760276-20190928163604

2. That was your point, it doesn’t contradict literally anything. He’s not speaking to people of the past, he’s talking to current viewers. The protection of the planet indeed could’ve been done by simply not doing anything, and now that’s not something that can be said anymore.

3. I don’t see your point nor does it matter to what I said. Children still need to learn things while they’re at an age where they will take these things to heart more than adults will, even though they won’t be able to do anything about it until they grow up. If you didn’t want to turn this into a “twitter debate” then you could’ve left it at “I don’t like the message Planet sends.” Although if this is just a harmless cartoon and doesn’t warrant debating over, maybe your extremely intense opinions on it are unwarranted, yes?

4. It’s a reasonable excuse that explains why things were done the way they were. It was the norm at the time and seen as the proper course of action. It may not have been, but this is not at fault of the show, but the era in which it was created.

6. https://www.everythingconnects.org/overpopulation-effects.html Here, a random-ass article I found explaining my side. See why this is pointless? Either open your mind and see why people even created the word “overpopulation” in the first place, and just disagree, or don’t bring it up as a point to hate a thirty year old children’s cartoon about preserving the planet.