Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-27822848-20150804155108/@comment-3463132-20150804202304

ParaGoomba348 wrote: 1. Yes, but at least "Go X" is more about who you want to win, and it presents things in a more positive light.

2. We do at least give people the benefit of a doubt and we try to avoid calling people biased. "Stomp" comments are beyond the line because no one likes them.

3. Or maybe the commenter didn't do the research and just is saying someone stomps? What if it's that, then whose problem is it? Also, Death Battle has done stomp fights and made them entertaining. What if the writer KNEW the fight would be a stomp?

4. Yeah, but predictions are at least helpful. Then we know WHY a character stomps. Kudos to you but all the same:

1. It's just as useless. And people honestly shouldn't be punished just because they expressed an opinion.

2. With respect, bullshit. I have seen plenty of clearly biased fights around here and have seen multiple users call the writer out on it.

3. Still the writer's actually, the commenter being right or wrong doesn't change who got mad about it. And the writer has a perfect opportunity to correct/speak with someone who feels like they know something about the characters.

And you undo your entire point of banning people when you mention that stomp battles can be fun- then why would saying it's a stomp be so bad? Spiderman vs Batman was a collosal stomp- but still fun to experience.

4. True- but again- if you're familiar with the characters- and you should be because you're writing about them- you shouldn't have a stomp if you don't want a stomp. If you want a stomp, you shouldn't be upset when someone says it's a stomp.