Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-5035900-20170120025856/@comment-28501958-20170120052501

First off, I agree that every writer on the wiki should be given at least a few days warning before their work is deleted, regardless of the cause. If nothing else comes from this, THAT at least should be agreed upon.

Death Battles are not and have never been an exact science. What one person claims to be a legitimate feat, another may call an outlier. One person may claim their power-scaling is legitimate, another may disagree. Multiple writers can look at the same character and give different interpretations of their abilities, and there's nothing wrong with that.

I don't particularly want works to be removed because their research or debating is questionable. I don't want the wiki to be flooded with poor battles, but I don't think that that's really a major concern. Most of the people on here at least attempt to research and debate properly.

I think the only reason I would agree to a poorly researched and debated battle being removed is because it would give someone else a chance to make a much better version of that fight. Perhaps instead of being deleted outright if the battle is poor, other people would be allowed to do the fight without asking the original writer's permission?