Thread:LeopoldTheBrave/@comment-7424710-20160430192012/@comment-7424710-20160430194211

LeopoldTheBrave wrote: Yeah I know what you mean. I guess I can take some of the blame for that though. I'm not the best at wording things.

I'm just also very aware that it's 2016, the age where people want to get offended easily for some reason no matter what it's about. I'm not trying to sound self-centered and egotistical with my responses, but how else am I supposed to reply against the insane hostility.

Say shit like this:

"Not really. I find what they have to be unreliable in most instances. But that's just my personal thoughts, and if you want to go there, be my guest."

Don't be that guy and say something like you just did. Now if you want my actual perspective on how you said it, and if you never commented clarification, I would've seen it as:

"[laugh] ANY (Not just DBF) website who believes in the Ganondorf No-Limits Fallacy is a no-go in my book. (In Ari's tl;dr Perspective Edition: "DON'T GO THERE. EVER.")"

And again, your claim was still wrong. WE AS A COMMUNITY DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE FALLACY, ONLY LIKE ONE GUY DID AND HE ADMITTED IT WAS WRONG AND DECIDED TO NOT FIX IT ON HIS OWN TERMS.

Does not connect, or is there more stuff that needs clarification?