Thread:Friendlysociopath/@comment-27676479-20160303014301/@comment-3463132-20160303223558

"Are legit serious right now?"

Nothing is legitimate about me, least of all how serious I am.

"It's never stated to be non-canon."

As I said, burden of proof is on the positive claim- in this case whether it is canon. It is not enough to say "I don't know". In court- do you know what happens when the plaintiff's case is "Well there's no proof it didn't happen like this"? The judge dismisses them on the spot. They've failed their burden of proof. (Granted such a case shouldn't have even come to a judge if this is the case but that's besides the point)

They're of questionable canon because a reasonable doubt can be raised about the authenticity- they're not beyond a reasonable doubt.

1) They're not actually part of any main plotline

2) The visuals do not add up properly-

I have satisified a reasonable doubt. So the burden is on the opposition to prove it is canon. You have to prove it is beyond a reasonable doubt. It's not enough to say "Nothing says otherwise".

"even though if it was caused by blowing him up from the inside, it would have blown him up a lot sooner after Kirby destroyed his insides, don't you think?"

No? I wasn't aware volatile explosives had a definitive point where they go off- do tell me more.

Also you seem to be misreading what I said. Marx is quite literally crackling with energy, so throwing him anywhere near a volatile material (and we already know Nova's insides are volatile via prievious explosion) would make a detonation.

Also you're still dodging the point- Marx didn't hit the center- he hit the outside. Simple physics is enough to tell you he cannot have been the sole reason for Nova to explode since Nova exploded from the center and in all directions. You're smarter than that Para- you know better.

"Ridiculous to not use high-ends"

What? No it isn't, you're not meant to use only high-ends. You look at highs and lows and find the middle- that's the entire point of that terminology existing in the first place.

"It's pretty clear that he punches a planet in half"

In a minigame that has not been proven to be canon.

"it's clear that he threw Marx into Nova"

It is clear Marx went into Nova after being defeated- nothing at all proves Kirby actually threw him there- that is yet another assumption.

"you did see the moon calc, right?"

The one that assumes Kirby was dead-center of the explosion? Yes I did.

"That's all pretty solid evidence that Kirby is planet-level."

It is no such thing because the first is not canon and the second and third are in no way proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Also you have to stack this evidence against all the evidence Kirby is not planet-level like canonically being harmed by far lesser attacks. You can't just pick and choose what parts of canon you consider and which parts you don't- you need the whole thing.