Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-5035900-20170120025856/@comment-27281390-20170217070426

Deleting a battle because of supposed "poor research" is a highly subjective, biased, and outrageous proposition. Heck, some of the official Death Battles could potentially fall under that category if they were articles on this wiki. In my opinion, it should not be the right of an admin, or ANYONE for that matter, to decide what constitutes a poorly researched battle and thereby delete it; it's a very slippery slope. As long as some form of research is done, I see no grounds for deletion there.