Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-27126152-20161017043524/@comment-26030372-20161031043200

Note that if people disagree it isn't instantly wrong. It all depends on whether the conclusion works or not.

For example:-

Wiz: Amy may have been fast, but Dedede was just far faster. Sure, her Hyper Form could help, but even that pales in comparison to Dedede's Magalor feat.

'''Boomstick: And while Hyper Form would put up a fight, Amy's base form can't even lay a finger on Dedede, who in turn would obliterate her with one hit. Don't forget how much better Dedede's arsenal is. Amy's head couldn't crack the case.'''

Wiz: The winner is King Dedede.

Basically a working conclusion. On the other hand, there's always a way when to tell the battle is pure BS:- a faulty results section.

Example:-

Wiz: Percy Jackson was strong but nothing can avoid an Avada Kedavra, so it's unreasonable to say Perce would either.

Boomstick: I guess Harry just gave Percy the green light to death.

Wiz: The winner is Harry Potter.

Yeah, this is exactly how you can tell when the results are BS. When the conclusion is short and lackluster. For all I care, you can say that the character who gets stomped wins with a well-worked out reasoning, and it still goes in the Hall of Records. On the other hand, regardless of whether right or wrong, a half-assed results section won't be entering the hall. Even if somebody like Flash lost to something like Mario, as long as there's some decent conclusion, it's a-okay for the hall. On the other hand, if Flash were to win, which is correct, but the conclusion was half-assed, it wouldn't go in the hall. You can't really say a fight's "incorrect", you can disagree, but a battle in no way is full-on "incorrect", because it's that users opinion on who wins, and you can disagree, but the point still stands. Even if a battle appears wrong, a solid results section gives it a pass. If it's right, with a half-assed conclusion, it doesn't get in.