Talk:Red vs Sans/@comment-26568830-20190520145936

I, like many others, disagree with the outcome-but I also have problems with the analysis, too.

It kinda seems that concerning the Pokemon, you cherrypick between using anime logistics and videogame logistics. Thunder has low accuracy in the games, as you mention; but Swift, despite always hitting the opponent in the games, doesn't literally do that in this battle. It's really inconsistent and it seems like you didn't want to go all-out in one direction-because in either direction, Red would win, so to make sure Sans has the victory the solution would be just to cherrypick weaknesses and strengths.

You also state that Charizard's speed isn't fast enough to overpower 'ten million gaster blasters' so he should lose, except you forget a few things about Charizard-the first being the move Protect, that nearly every Pokemon can use, which would shield him from a Million and one blasters. You also assume that, despite a human child being able to dodge the blasters in rapid succession, a dragon with much higher speed couldn't? That doesn't seem to add up. The argument here would be that Chara is Faster than Lightning, which Charizard has already proven to be, so that argument doesn't work.

Also, you seem to think that Sans can actually outlast all 6 of his Pokemon, despite the fact that Charizard and Pikachu alone would've given Sans a major issue in terms of his stamina. Hell, let's throw in Snorlax too-a very bulky 'mon that even you admit can take a lot of attacks. With that in mind, Sans would never have enough energy to go through all six Pokemon.

Still a good fight though, and I like the grammar. Good job, friend!