Talk:Saitama/@comment-25930937-20161216051917/@comment-36926418-20180922024053

@Shakaboy

"Just because Saitama has shown to beat everybody in one punch doesn't mean he is incapable of being beaten."

It depends what he is being beaten at (Rock Paper Scissors against Silverfang and Mosquitoes, which includes the limits you mentioned), but so far when it comes to physically destroying him (without using space vacuum), there is nowhere in the entire show of him getting physically injured by any of the attacks he has taken, let alone getting killed. There's a post called 'The Saitama Conundrum' I recommend people find that post because it's a giant essay and I won't post it here.

For example the DBZ verse, I understand that the Gods of Destruction and Zeno can defeat Saitama, but anyone else? No. . I do not even agree with the Kid Buu since all he needs to do is use the vacuum as a weapon, but in an indestructable area then that would be different. Heck even in the Superman vs Goku Death battle (which I agreed with) even Superman didn't necessarily used the vacuum as a weapon to kill Goku.

While I acknowledge that Saitama sometimes needs to do more than one punch to beat an opponent, the only reason why people think that (without using a vacuum or magic as a weapon against Saitama) "[character here] has destroyed bigger things than Saitama" and all that needs to be said is "so"? It doesn't prove that Saitama can be destroyed by said ability. Even with Godzilla surviving a blackhole, he can still be injured by other means (if a character can be injured then they can be killed) and there is said to be a different (and ONLY WAY) to destroy Godzilla See Godzilla Earth VS Cloverfield . One of Goku's powerful punches/blasts can destroy more than what we've seen Saitama destroy, that doesn't mean that Saitama is vulnerable against Goku's attacks.

Goku has better POWER, but not better DURABILITY than Saitama. Because Saitama is a joke character, a satire. He's literally made to kill powerful enemies with little-to-no effort.