Talk:Beerus VS Bowser/@comment-26153757-20180326174051/@comment-32986854-20180421165701

"Seb, you are. You are being hostile to Paleo for his opinion. Even though this battle was made months ago, you are still here telling Paleo that he's wrong, and for absolutely no reason." >Nothing about Sebastian's comment was the least bit hostile. {https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hostile}

He simply explainned what he found wrong with what paleo said. If we follow your subjectivie disposition of what "hostile" is, then every single vs debate is a hostile encounter via the mere nature of what it is.

He said Paleo was wrong then proceeded to provide links on why he was wrong, he did not call him wrong for "absolutely no reason" whether you agree with said links or not is irrelevant to the matter.

This is an appeal to motive.

{https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_motive}

Regarding the actual debte, I could care less about this since it's been done to death.