Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-7424710-20161211172347

Yeah, it was about time we did this. Basically, some people have been complaining about some things being a "safe space" with the entirety of the rules set if not just complaints about other rules. While I disagree in some points, I do think some things are more loose than others, but I as an individual don't know problems everyone has. However, each is their own and can propose their own edits or removals.

For example: I believe the One-Word Comment rule needs to be revised. The rule states the following:

While it may seem that it's perfectly fine, "I agree/disagree" IS contributing to a page if the outcome is shown, even if it seems vague. In the comment, they're not saying they agree and that means it has to be deleted because they didn't explain why they do, they're only saying they agree with what the outcomes states, therefore they already say why they agree, it's in the outcome itself. "X stomps" ISN'T contributing anything due to being so vague and actually not giving reason that's already presented. "Fuck this fight." ISN'T contributing anything due to the foul taste in it. If it's not giving insight to the fight with proper reason, then it has no need to exist.
 * One word comments (ex. bull****, wrong)
 * Comments that contribute to nothing and are often comprised of two or three words (ex."I agree/disagree" or "X stomps")

Do you think the same? Yes No Basically, this thread is a genral to propose edits or removals to a rule. This is NOT a place to propose new additions to the Rules & Guidelines, for that would require its own thread. If you have a revision idea you want to speak out on, feel free to do so. We're always listening and eager for your opinion. 