User blog comment:Pikazilla/SO MUCH WRONG: Silver vs Shredder/@comment-5429941-20170907151114/@comment-97641-20170907194733

No-Limits-Fallacy is an odd topic. Afterall if Superman is both indestructible but has infinite strength then it cancels out; so a Superman vs Bizzaro fight would mean infinite strength does not one-shot but infinite durability does not tank: so they both could be infinite while still engaging in a fair fight. But with Doomsday; he's beyond that apparently, as in infinite strength doesn't break through his infinite durability because he doesn't have infinite durability; he as immunity to past forms of damage. So it's less about who is infinite or not and more about 'Doomsday is OP because he can just be immune to anything in the long-term'.

As for 18; they wanted two similar characters fighting each other and just assumed that they both have an 'energy absorbing theme'. I wish they would do more 'apples-and-oranges' fights instead of 'mirror matches'.

As for the Logia argument; the 'he can eat fire' argument makes some sense, but yeah, I have no idea why they thought Ace was weak to electricity.

As for Renamon; if Renamon was allowed to evolve then Lucario would have been allowed to Mega Evolve and then we basically are reliving Augumon vs Charizard. They wanted to ignore evolutions for that specific episode, just to see what would happen.

However I do agree with you in the idea that many of these battles have had odd analysis-es and conclusions.