Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-24530269-20180826113808/@comment-24530269-20180831085411

Vrokorta wrote: I was looking at the tier list, and I was a little confused by the criteria for acheiving a tier. For example, Top Tier is for characters with a 3 win difference, however, several characters in that tier have a 4 win difference. Not only that, but our tiers don't cover the values between -3 & 3. I was thinking that, instead of saying [insert number] difference, we'd say [insert ratio] difference. For example, instead of 3 win difference, it'd be 3-4 win difference. That way, it'd be more clear what the criteria for each tier is. I was also thinking we'd add a tiers for 1-2 loss difference, 0 win difference, and 1-2 win difference. Let me know if there are any objections, in case I'm missing something. This sounds like a pretty good idea.