Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-26221704-20170207015924/@comment-3463132-20170208173743

GalacticAttorney wrote: @Friendly I understand your good intentions but there's really no need for you to "save us" from the work we've cut out for ourselves. This is the way we're doing it and we'd like to keep it that way for simplicity's sake, so can you try not to insert yourself into the management of a staff project?

@Iva We're not using all 89 characters if that wasn't obvious enough. Hell, 20 is too much as well. I can fit 10 before it starts looking like a clusterfuck. And as I said, you don't need to instert yourself into a staff project, we've got a plan we're gonna go by to have it work out.

Somehow "feedback and advice" became "inserting ourselves"? I tried to help you- I didn't ask for a spot or control or anything else. Please leave your insecurity issues elsewhere.

That said, you are using 89 characters at the moment, in the polls- not the actual picture. And you're going to be cutting that down anyways from what I can tell so I was asking why you chose the most difficult way to do it instead of choosing any of the better ways?

Derp already pointed out you're going to be separating them based on media- doing this from the beginning and just making a thread for each would save you work. You're adding another step- which is why I tried to help since I have taken multiple classes in problem solving and data collection.

If you don't want help, fine, do more work for the same result.