Talk:Link vs Kirito/@comment-32120189-20170711194535/@comment-3463132-20180409063242

TLDR if I didn't mention it- it's probably because I don't consider it a viable feat to debate with. Covering anything in darkness means nothing in terms of strength or anything else.

Dimension-creation is not worth anything in terms of feats- star or no star. Notice how in video games these people are always defeating by beings of lesser showings than the dimension-creating-metric gives?

Majora was going to drop a city-sized moon, sure, doesn't translate to anything; Link has a cutscene where he dies if that lands on him. Contrary to VSbattle doctrine- not all magic is applicable to battle or stats.

Moving the mountain is just a side note in a book; it doesn't specify to what extent he could move the mountain, how high the mountain is (official mountains exist at as little as 100 meters, not to mention it's possibly hyperbole in the first place as moving mountains is actually a saying) or what the mountain was made of- none of this is specified because it never happened. A feat where you can define almost literally nothing is not a feat worth using in a debate.

A 100 story building is exactly 330 meters btw- neat fact.