Talk:Saitama/@comment-25930937-20161216051917/@comment-25760276-20180922054803

Okay, but you're missing the point. "Assuming" Saitama can't be killed by Goku is just that. An assumption. Not sweating over fighting the strongest people he's been shown to beat means... nothing, because we have no idea then what his "sweating point" would be, in any way. I really don't care if he so far has "immunity to physical injury," because it has never been stated as such, nor has it been stated that he has a hax means of doing so.

A newborn baby who has never gotten into a fight or been hurt by literally anything does not have "physical immunity to injury" just because we never SAW it be hurt ever, that is a ridiculous claim.

We absolutely have to judge people based on their highest feats of strength and not make any assumptions to boost them higher, because... that's a no-limits fallacy. A very common fallacy many people use stating that because no limit has been shown (such as Saitama not being shown to sweat,) it means that they must not have any limit at all. Which is... ludicrous. An awful argument. You absolutely have to judge Saitama based on the highest he's been shown, which currently is far below Goku. Until Saitama's power gets upgraded through means of official sources and not blatant NLF assumptions, that is the whole truth of it.

(Also, Goku DOES have the God of Destruction's Hakai technique. He displayed it very clear in the manga. However, this point does not concern me and has nothing to do with what I mentioned above, as Goku should physically beat out Saitama regardless.)