Thread:HappyHorn/@comment-27150398-20200109123254

Hello Happy, I wanted to talk to you regarding your behaviour on the Natsu & Happy vs. Red & Charizard and Amy Rose vs. Juvia Lockser pages.

Rule 6: '''Please keep all debates civil, both in chat and in comment sections. If you don't agree or find faults with a death battle here or a canon one you're allowed to say so but please do so in detail.''' As well if you enjoyed the battle then you should say as well. This is so you users will avoid using statements such as "This is so wrong, you're a dumbass" or "I disagree heavily, fight was stupid/utter trash" where they give no reason for why they disagree or dislike the fight.
 * In debates, please learn to accept other's views and take a non-hostile, civil approach to debating. For example, you might use power-scaling but some others do not or you don't agree with another user on a character's destructive capability. In both these examples, do not disrespect one another for having different views at all. Do not use profane/vulgar words meant to make your debating opponent seem like a lesser person (ex. Wanker, fanboy, dumbass, etc). Essentially please be open-minded when debating and try not to come off as a close-minded know it all.

On said pages you posted comments stating you disagreed with both battles. While stating your honest views on a fight is perfectly acceptable, when Phoenix Firestorm replied back to you and started debating the outcome of his battles with you, the way you worded your comments came across as if you were trying to force your views on him which violates Rule 6 of the Rules and Guidelines. You even stated to Phoenix that he “cherry picked” Natsu as the winner of his Natsu & Happy vs. Red & Charizard page which is a completely unreasonable statement to make unless you have sufficient evidence to prove that he’s being biased towards a particular character. While you may not have intended to come across as rude and forceful in your comments towards Phoenix, you did unfortunately and so I’d like to recommend that you try and be more respectful of other user’s views when debating with them in the future and try to not force your own views upon them.

Rule 25: Please do not use any Tiering systems (e.g. The VS Battles or Omniversal Battlefield Tiering systems) to solely decide the outcome of a fight. While it is ok for users to use them as part of their explanation for why one character beats another character, as Death Battle doesn't use said systems in their fights it would be inappropriate for any users on here to only use them to justify the outcome of one their fights. If a battle is found to solely be using a particular Tiering system to justify it’s outcome, the author will be given a Warning and will have 2 weeks to edit the results to include another reason for the character’s victory, other than a particular character’s tier, otherwise the page will be deleted.
 * This also applies to comments as well, any comment that is solely using a particular Tiering system to justify their reasoning will be deleted.

I’ve also noticed that you tend to rely on VS Battle Wiki stats a lot when making comments on other user’s battles. Since not all contributors to this site use the VS Battle Wiki tiering system when debating, I’d advise that you try not to use it as much when engaging in debates in the future as doing so may result in your comments being deleted.

If you do not take my advice on board, me and the other Admins may unfortunately have to consider blocking you from the wiki.

Good day. 