Talk:Red vs Sans/@comment-26568830-20190520145936/@comment-25760276-20190520172537

Cherry-picking Pokemon stats just to make Sans win is something I wholeheartedly disagree with. Thunder having low accuracy isn't only game mechanics, but also something that can happen in real life, since lightning is famous for not striking people very often. Swift, on the other hand, while it does have 100% accuracy in the games, literally cannot have that in every battle scenario with an outside opponent, since that would be a blatant no limits fallacy.

You can argue if Sans is fast enough to dodge these attacks, yes, and I would likely agree with your conclusion on that point, but saying I should've stuck absolutely to game mechanics with Swift since I apparently did for Thunder is something I cannot agree with.

I don't like Sans. I like Red. This is my word, and it will always reign true. So I have no motive to cherry-pick my methods to make a character I dislike win. No bias was involved, I just got the outcome wrong.

I don't find the "Chara is a child, Charizard is a dragon!" argument to be at all substantial. Charizard is faster, I see that, but the argument you used there isn't something I can get behind. At all.

This argument is just throwing out opinions as facts. Opinions I can get behind, yes, but with no actual evidence explaining why Sans wouldn't be able to last against these Pokemon, or why Pikachu/Charizard alone could handle the fight. I encourage you to further this argument, because there obviously is something there for you to crush me with.

Thank you for the compliment!