Talk:Link vs Kirito/@comment-3463132-20160208014111/@comment-3463132-20160210020345

Did- did Quant just defend me? Wow- I really did fall into a new dimension- holy shit.

@Taco "downplay"

Link- prove me wrong. If you can't then you lose and I can judge Link however I please using the same logic that is used to judge official debates.

Shulk- everything I said about him is true? His FTL "feat" is a dream (and so not a feat) and he does manipulate Ether (which his foes 9/10 times will not have nor any substitute for)- are you one of those lovely fellows who calls insisting canon events and power descriptions be regarded as canon 'downplay'? Because you are not the first to do something that silly and multiple people told the last guy who did that he was lying.

Doom- Yeah I know, PIS when he loses but not when he wins- because clearly PIS can't go both ways.

Fett- The hell have I ever said bad about Fett? I very distinctly recall saying he should win several matches- the only thing that comes to mind is when I tell people off for saying Fett held his own against Vader- which is blatantly ignoring the entire comic and how Fett very clearly was losing hardcore despite throwing everything he had at Vader.

Vader- So sorry I don't think one (wrong- like legit mathematically wrong) calc about Starkiller's power overrides multiple feats of Vader getting taken down and wounded by stuff that isn't on the level of said calc. Wait... no, no I'm not sorry about that at all.

Kirby- What? That came out of nowhere- have I even commented on Kirby matches here?

Shame on you btw, you've completely missed my RWBY downplay, shame on you indeed.

"Kirito is human level"

Well he's not human by any definition of the word so you're wrong once.

Also he very clearly has superhuman feats so you're wrong twice.

And screw it, you're wrong three times because you've given me no indication you know anything about Kirito and I like the number 3.