Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-7424710-20161211172347/@comment-5035900-20161217235501

ImagoDesattrolante wrote: @Ari: Where nothing can be said or criticized, or something can be said but it is just so watered down it is basically useless. No swear words can be said at all, no big words or anything. Not allowed to call someone delusional, biased, petulant, obnoxious, annoying, childish or anything like that - it is so watered and grinded down into something young children would find a bit absurd. You are not allowed to debate with anyone, you are not allowed to argue anything, etc. I sound like I'm rambling but I am seriously afraid of this wiki turning into a bit of a hugbox. An excerp from Do we want Forum Weapons & shaming to be in this Wiki's future?:

''I subscribe very much to the mindset of "If you have nothing nice to say, say nothing at all". Two knee-jerk reactions:''

"CENSORSHIP!"

"So you're saying I can't criticize someone?"

''That's false. Constructive criticism, literally telling them your issues and how to better themselves, is actually one of the nicest things you can say to someone. Because contrary to popular internet definitions, constructive criticism isn't telling them to roll over and die.''

We are entirely for things being said and criticized, debated and argued: just not in such fashions that are meant to attack or demean. One doesn't need to do such to criticize or debate.