Talk:Cell vs laharl/@comment-31550106-20180526204514/@comment-26036704-20190213093038

Alright it's been awhile but this comment has bothered me for awhile.

"oh then this battle was poorly researched."

First off I made this fight when I was new to vs debating. In fact it was litterally the first fight I ever made vs debating wise.

Second off I knew about big bang attack... But if a shocker it moved so fast I did not see the rest of the stars. So I just thought it was Galaxy level.

"I agree with the verdict, but Cell is far stronger and faster than this battle said."

Also please tell me how he's stronger and faster. I litterally high balled Cell giving him the Kiao-ken, high balling him speed wise by assuming his attack reached the sun in 10 milliseconds, and gave him a half % light speed feat that has been debunked about 50 billion times, stacked on a theoretical multiplier ontop of that and gave his speed a 200 times boost for no reason. That's a 2000x boost for litterally no reason.

I fail to see how I lowballed Cell when I tried my best to give him the maximum possible speed I could.