Talk:Darth Maul vs Black Panther/@comment-27019676-20191211232619/@comment-27019676-20191214022525

"I said Wolverine tagged Speed Demon, not Black Panther, and Spider-Man admitted that Black Panther is faster than him."

Ok, but...you're still ignoring Maul's speed feats so at this point I don't know what you're trying to push here. Also, you're scaling Black Panther to Wolvie, which is even more loose because theres a clear difference in their level of strength and destructive capability.

And are you sure Spider-man admitted that?

"And no, Snake don't have high-frequency blade, but Raiden does, and the realize why I explain it about hf blade, because like Raiden, Black Panther have antartic vibranium, I searched it up, and I discovered that vibroweapon is exactly like Raiden's HF blade, vibroweapon can blocked the lightsaber, so it's likely that his anti-metal claw would do the same."

Again, nothing about Metal Gear Solid should be taken into account. They're clearly separate franchises with separate interpretations on how their respected in-game feats are taken into account. Take DC for example. Their interpretation on how infinite speed works is once you've attained lightspeed, you're basically set for life. At no point are either of these franchises in contact with each other, so comparing lightsabers to high-frequency blades means absolutely nothing.

And to that lightsaber resistance link you showed me, what is that suppose to prove? Durasteel isn't listed on there for one, so you've already debunked yourself with the notion that Luke didn't harm Vader in the fight. Not to mention Vibranium isn't on there because its strictly a fictional metal within the Marvel Unvierse. And I still sincerely doubt the blades are comparable to each other, because again...Maul is faster. If you continue downplaying like this it'll become more clear that you don't know what you're talking about because already that's what I'm assuming.