User blog comment:Fedora Lord Para 348/Defending Death Battle Fanon: A Series by ParaGoomba348/@comment-26363797-20150803203919/@comment-96.255.112.88-20150812172916

@Grnmachine1

Yes ive got nothing to say   

Obviously you do, as you made a whole new comment 6 hours after you said you wouldn't respond to me anymore.

because you keep taking what i say out of context, putting words in my mouth and outright ignoring half of my arguments.

Because it's incorrect. I respond to the sentence, not the entire paragraph, because the sentence is straight up WRONG. If the opening sentence of your argument states something that isn't true, then I don't need to quote the entire paragraph. The incorrect first sentence is all I need to disprove it. If the starting premise of your argument is incorrect, I don't need to quote everything else to prove you wrong. You were never right in the first place.

Intangibility is not a knee-jerk reaction, its a counter-argument.

Sure it is.

'"Intangibility Intangibility Intangibility." "Intangibility counters" " He may not know whats happening, but he does know how to fix it- Intangibility."'

Great arguments. Your go to argument is literally "lol… muh intangibility."

'''Also, Danny could very likely get enough damage in on Ben, forcing him to return to Human form- this has happened. And when this happens, the Omnitrix wont work for some time, meaning Ben is vulnerable.'''

No. I've explained this to you multiple times already, If by some miracle, Danny injures Ben to the point where he loses his transformation, and Danny tries to kill or possess him,The Omnitrix would automatically transform Ben into the alien he needs to survive. Also, Danny would have no idea what the Omnitrix is, what it does, what any of its functions are, or what its capable of. Stop trying to give Danny knowledge of the Omnitrix's functions. Both characters are going in blind. Have you not been paying attention? Thats like the third time you tried using the "Danny could knock Ben out" argument. And if fails every time. Stop it. You're embarrassing yourself.

'''The Omnitrix can override this- but thats if its super-high stakes. This isnt- to the omnitrix its just another fight that Ben got into.'''

What? Was that even english?

Lastly, though there are some that could hurt Danny, very few aliens are actually capable of actually killing him

Quite a few aliens are capable of killing Danny, and many more can hurt Danny. Some even while intangible. NRG, Alien X, Atomix, Pesky Dust, Gutrot, AmpFibian, Echo Echo, Clockwork, Way Big, Gravattack, Chromastone, Ghostfreak, Feedback, Big Chill, Diamondhead,Shocksquatch, Articguana, Heatblast, Toepick, Whampire, Ball Weevil, Buzzshock, Eye Guy, Upchuck, and more. That combined with the option to gain personal information in the fight (Pesky Dust) along with the ability to fix mutated DNA spells trouble for Danny. A claim you still haven't addressed.

As for the Omnitrix choosing the right one- Danny's not an alien, the Omnitrix wouldnt be able to recognize Danny,

The point I was trying to make was that Ben can fix mutated DNA, the thing that gives Danny his powers. I wasn't arguing that Ben would add Danny to the Omnitrix. I never said anything like that.

and therefore its up to chance as to whether or not Ben finds an alien capable of killing Danny.

No it isn't. ParaGoomba348 tried that argument and failed miserably at it. "What randomness factor? Stop making things up. Even if Ben doesn't get his selected alien, the Quick Change Feature allows him to change into something else, and the Fail-Safe (that thing you're trying so hard to downplay) would keep him alive even if Ben were about to get killed. There is no "randomness factor."

With the information exposed in this comment chain, Danny loses, get over it. Even funnier is that you're still trying to nerf Ben, the Omnitrix's fail-safe, the quick change feature, and somehow feel it's justified giving Ben ONLY 10 RANDOM ALIENS. While Danny is put at his best. What is wrong with you?

This argument has been going in circles. You say something, I disprove it. You speculate, I shut it down, You say the same thing you said the first time worded differently, I disprove it again. You speculate some more, I prove it wrong.

Seriously, you have been making the same 3 or so claims over and over again hoping that I forget, or change my answer. Have you been reading my comments at all? Or have you just been reading the first few words, and copy-pasting your debunked arguments again hoping I couldn't tell the difference?