Thread:Danibom/@comment-26198742-20180407223454

2. All What-If? Death Battles are to be respected, content and outcome included. Criticism must be constructive and outcomes you disagree with are to be respectfully disagreed with and explained in detail.

10. While non-canon material for a character is allowed for research (provided the same is done for their opponent), fan-made content is NOT an acceptable form of information.

22. Please do not use the VS Battles Tiering system to solely decide the outcome of a fight. While it is ok for users to use it as part of their explanation for why one character beats another character, as Death Battle dosen’t use said system in their fights it would be inappropriate for any users on here to only use it to justify the outcome of own their fights. If a battle is found to solely be using the VS Battle Tiering System to justify it’s outcome, the author will be given a Warning and will have 2 weeks to edit the results to include another reason for the character’s victory other than a particular character’s tier, otherwise the page will be deleted.
 * This also applies to comments as well, any comment that is solely using VS Battle Tiering to justify their reasoning will be deleted.

Alright, let's start with the Violations of Rule 2.

"This battle is equal to Bomberman vs Dig Dug which is one of the wrongest battles with poor research I ever see."

Explain to me, '''what made you think this comment was at okay to write? I can understand if you do not agree with the outcome, does NOT give you the right to to flat out insult their death battle by comparing it another regardless of it's accuracy or not something you also did on Klonoa vs Pac-Man and on Crash vs. Spyro saying that the Deviantart version of the match was more accurate and completely ignoring the fact that as I said on that page, Writers have different views when it comes to the same battle and their views do NOT '''need to be the same as anther's simply because they believe in something else.

Now onto Rule 10, you have been going on numerous pages leaving comments like this

"Even if Sweet Tooth absorbs Polygon Man powers, Wario still should beat him specially with his invincible forms and Mario Party feats."

"This battle can be fair if Pikachu gets PokéPark feats and if Cole absorbs Polygon Man powers but Cole would beat Pikachu with his superior abilities:"

And much more, firstly you are essentially telling users to include abilities, Feats, and sources that either make the match one-sided in another characters favor, Have shown no form of abilities, outliers, or are essentially only providing Non-Canon info for one character while giving none for the other such as suggesting that the writer of Krillin vs. Heihachi should include DBS Feats for Krillin and Polygon Man's Powers for Heihachi when not only is DBS Canon but Polygon Man's Powers are Non-Canon too Tekken.

You are offering no Non-Canon for one character but are offering no Non-Canon for the others which is against the rules as you are more or less telling them to essentially be selective and using only a select pieces of information ignoring hte fact that they might have different views on the characters which I have told you before, you simply cannot suggest or tell someone what they should use for a character as what you are suggesting is both selective and honestly make it more one-sided than it needs to be.

Another thing is that you are repeatedly breaking Rule 22 of the Rules and Guidelines as you are continuously linking and using Character Stats, Omniversal Battlefield, and VsBattle Wiki to justify your reasoning and only using that without giving an explanation and while Omniversal and Character Stats are not Vs Battle, they do however utilize the same tiering system as VsBattle.

Ultimately, this is UNACCEPTABLE you have been warned for similar issues to this before in the past and you are continuously leaving comments that are either improper debating, have no evidence supporting the claim, outliers, Violating Rule 22, or are suggesting to the writers to essentially break Rule 10.

This is your Final Warning Dani, any continuation of this will result in a block. 