Talk:Garnet vs. Wolverine/@comment-2092177-20151005170557

All right, I don't normally do this, but here are my thoughts and predictions on this match-up: What Mike said is true, for the most part. Garnet outclasses Wolverine in strength, speed, and experience. She was able to easily pick up and swing around a battle axe the size of a house, reacted to a bolt of lightning, and has been fighting for thousands of years. However, I wouldn't say their durability is that equal. So far, the hardest thing Garnet's tankes is a charge from Jasper, but we don't really know how powerful Jasper's charge is, and even then she was still visably hurt by it. Wolverine on the other hand has tanked punches from the Hulk, somebody who's strong enough to hold up an entire mountain on his shoulders. In other words, somebody much stronger than Garnet. So I would say Wolverine has the durability advantage... But the thing is, that's really the only advantage Wolverine needs. In Wolverine vs. Raiden, the primary Raiden won because he was able to counter Wolverine's healing factor and unbreakable adamantium skeleton with his Murasama blade, which can slice through things at a molecular level. They even said Wolverine could have outlasted Raiden if the Murasama wasn't capable of cutting through his skeleton. Garnet on the other hand, she has never fought anyone with a healing factor before, and therefor probably would have no idea how to counter it. Even with that aside, the hardest thing Garnet's broken is stone, and there's been no evidence to support the idea that Garnet's strong enough to break adamantium. Wolverine would easily be able to outlast her until he "poofs" her, whereas Garnet just has no way of putting him down for good, unless she somehow wins through battlefield removal.

Winner: Wolverine.