Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-27126152-20161017043524/@comment-3463132-20161204000556

Well, I'm gonna type out the "full" explanation of those points to see if I can figure out whether you guys like them or not.

1) The conclusion should match the bios, not contradict them.

This means if you mention feats in the bios that clearly show an advantage for one character (Like say, someone who can shatter a mountain vs someone who can shatter a building) that your conclusion shouldn't state the building-buster is stronger than the mountain-buster.

 2) The conclusion should have at least 3 reasons for the outcome that was decided upon.

This shouldn't honestly be that hard, even if the characters are dead-even in all but one stat- you can make 3 reasons out of that. "Even though X and Y are equally strong and skilled, Y held an advantage in speed that X couldn't keep up with."

This is still 3 reasons, X = Y in strength, X = Y in skill, Y > X in speed. 3) The conclusion should reference the feats presented in the bios.

This also shouldn't be hard, if you mention a feat in the bio, you should be able to mention it in the conclusion. "Due to her immense speed, allowing her to cross a room before bullets could reach her, Y was faster than X."