Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-27150398-20180211135035/@comment-27150398-20190202220233

Hello everyone, I would like to post an important message that Ghost was planning to post here about the type of battle reviews that some users had been posting on this thread. I’d highly recommend that the users who tend to post shorter battle reviews on this thread, have a read of his message.

Commander Ghost - "Alright because both Myself and the Other Admins as well as Users, are truthfully beginning to get annoyed by this issue and I have been given permission by Big to address this.

It has come to our attention that various users (They know who they are) have commented on this Thread Leaving Reviews that DO NOT give Proper Reviews to some users battle, instead leaving a short and/or brief sentences that don't do anything but praise the battle and don't tell the User asking for the Review anything on what can be done to Improve the fight or giving Critique and more recently critique battles for things that SUPPOSED TO BE present in battles something that quite frankly; Is Unacceptable.

Reviews should be detailed, descriptive, and should inform the user what exactly was the Strong Points of the fight battle from the Research, the Fight, the Music Used, too the explanation for the Winner and should also contain critique especially if the user themselves is asking for CRITIQUE meaning they want comments that are Constructive and telling them what they need to fix and improve upon.

Comments that are Ideal are comments that have been consistently left by users such as MadMaxPyro, Vrokorta, Big The Cat10, and Zacisawesome101; whether you know the series or not is irrelevant as knowledge on a series doesn't factor in too saying whether or not their are Grammer Mistakes, Issues with the Paragraph's Structure, Whether the Reasoning is explained well, etc.

Big and I should not have to repeadetly see people giving a detailed, descriptive, and constructive review of another User's Battle and have theirs reviewed only too recieve a brief review that doesn't offer any form of critiscm and there is no such thing as "Having no Critiscm too say" since you can easily point out flaws such as the aforementioned Grammar Mistakes, Paragraph Structuring, etc.

All in All, it's becoming ridiculous and unfair to those who actually wish to recieve proper critique and it certainly isn't right that users are potentially discouraged from using the Thread because of that issue.

So I am going to kindly ask those that leave Short and Non-Helpful Review that you either begin giving proper reviews and valid critiscm or that you kindly stop commenting on this thread because it's unfair to a large number of users. "