Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-34634523-20180313212625/@comment-29403514-20180313213805

I personally would say no. If the rule is outdated, then it definitely does need to be revised for confusion as you mentioned in chat. The problem in general is how broad it is and the fact it can be abused. For example, Excalibur Sonic has a battle. Someone might make a battle like Zoro VS Sonic (Base Sonic) because they both have usage of swordplay in combat. What's to stop Excalibur Sonic VS Zoro from being made for the exact same reasons? You could say it could be deleted for it being a duplicate, but it would be allowed by technicality or else we would have to delete Scourge VS Zoro (if it were a page) by the same logic. One problem.

Another would be something like Jekyll and Hyde Syndrome. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are both different personas of the same person, but they both act differently. Should both be allowed in battle? Again, that broadness only causes more unnecessary issues if anything. You could logically say Super Sonic should have his own battles just because it gives Sonic more abilities and is somewhat different despite it literally acting the same way, having little to no differences, etc. Broadness shouldn't be exchanged for what is actual clarity in my honest opinion. That is my outlook of it though.