Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-27126152-20161017043524/@comment-26030372-20161031145031

MP999 wrote: So, then who would be the judge, and where would the line be drawn? The most fair way is a vote, but putting someone's battle on trial to see if it's good enough for a HoR seems a little harsh. It... really isn't much of a chore to just fix a conclusion. Maybe the mod who's adding the battle has to say the conclusion isn't good enough if it isn't? Besides, there should be a standard for conclusions imo, where if the reasons aren't well-detailed or there isn't much to go off of is invalid.