Thread:ChitiMouse/@comment-26198742-20190317205147

2. All What-If? Death Battles are to be respected, content and outcome included. Criticism must be constructive and outcomes you disagree with are to be respectfully disagreed with and explained in detail.

15. The removal/replacement of an entire battle out of spite for the outcome is unacceptable and punishable by an immediate ban.

16. All fictional characters are to be respected, even if you do not like the character (ex. "I hate Starkiller and I want to see him killed painfully"-type comments are not allowed). This includes spite battles.

Alright, I'll just jump straight into it.

Whether Jack is a Spoiled Brat or not is '''Irrelevant as that gives you NO right to violate Rule 16 and repeatedly insult Princess Morbucks. '''I can understand if you do not like that Character and that is fine, you are allowed to not like the Character however that gives you no justification to call her a "Stupid Piece of Shit", "Bitch", and what you Headcannon Jack as is irrelevant as this Wikia looks at Canonical info about a Character, not what other people think is canon about said character.

Secondly, regardless of whether you like Morbucks or not is also irrelevant as that gives you absolutely NO RIGHT too attempt to mark Gog's Battle as a Candidate of Deletion for the simple fact of you not agreeing with it or what Jack was labeled as; If you disagree with the battle then you need to do so in a RESPECTFUL AND CONSTRUCTIVE manner.

'''As a result, you have been Block for Two Weeks; I suggest you use this time to Read the Rules &amp; Guidelines of this Wikia as to avoid furhter issues in the future as this Behavior is not tolerated. Any contiuation of this Behavior when your Ban is lifted will result in Further Warnings and Harsher Punishment.'''

Good Day

Also, before you attempt ot make a sock account, I suggest you read this Rule as that will make your Block worse.

26. Please DO NOT create alternate accounts/sockpuppet accounts to dodge blocks and/or chat bans. If any users are found to have created sockpuppet accounts, their sockpuppet accounts will be given infinite blocks and/or infinite chat bans along with their original account. We understand that this might sound a bit strict, but if we were more tolerant of sockpuppets, there would likely be lots of blocked/banned users trying creating them, which would cause a lot more disorder and chaos on the wiki.
 * However, if you wish to have a detailed discussion with a member of the Admin team (preferably the Admin who blocked you or the Head Bureaucrat) about why your original account was blocked you are allowed to create an alternate account to SOLELY carry out this purpose. If you are found using said alternate account to do anything else other than inquire about your block (ex. editing pages) then this will count as proper sockpuppeting and both your alternate and original accounts will be given infinite blocks. Additionally, if you begin to get aggressive or even abusive towards the Admin you’re talking with, your alternate account will be blocked and you will not be able to discuss your block with the Admin team anymore.
 * If you wish to discuss a Chat Ban with the Chat Mod, Superintendent, Discussion Mod, Operator, Overall Moderator or Admin that gave the Chat Ban and you’re not already blocked, you don’t need to create an alternate account to have this discussion with them and can just talk with them using your original account.
 * These discussions should generally only be used by users to clarify why they have been blocked and it is unlikely that they will be unblocked after the conservation has taken place (unless they were blocked because of a genuine misunderstanding) so after a member of the Admin team has clarified the exact reason why the user was blocked,they should simply wait until the block on their original account has expired (or move on if their original account has been given an infinite block) otherwise both their alternate and original accounts will be given infinite blocks. 