Talk:Gandalf VS Dumbledore/@comment-27019625-20160410021511

I've got to say, I disagree with this.

Let's take a look at what happens, when Wizards, in the two respective universes, fight each other. Dumbledore, through his mastery of magic alone, could take down the most powerful wizard in the world-- the holder of the Elder Wand, a Deathly Hallow. Gandalf was tossed around by Sauraman, in very underwhelming displays of magic.

Though you claim a lack of feats, it appears to be, generally, more out of lacking research. Dumbledore has plenty of feats and stats-- and, yes, he's extremely well-versed in offensive magic. I'm not saying he'd win, but, I do take issue with the lack of research presented. Hell, Dumbledore's entire analysis was an insult to the character and his universe.

Sure, Gandalf is basically a demigod. But, it has to be scaled. Being a demi-god is no feat, when a regular wizard can theoretically do the same things as said demigod. And, in Dumbledore's case, possibly surpass it.